Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion (BVD): Cau­ses, Sym­ptoms, and Tre­at­ment with Prism Glas­ses

Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion (BVD) — also known as bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment or hete­ro­pho­ria — is an often over­loo­ked visu­al con­di­ti­on that occurs only during bino­cu­lar visi­on (when both eyes are open). It is cau­sed by a subt­le imba­lan­ce in the eye move­ment mus­cles and can lead to a wide ran­ge of non-spe­ci­fic sym­ptoms that are fre­quent­ly not reco­gni­zed as being rela­ted to the eyes.

Many peo­p­le live for years wit­hout kno­wing that their sym­ptoms are con­nec­ted to a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment — or that the­se sym­ptoms can often be com­ple­te­ly and per­ma­nent­ly resol­ved with pro­per­ly fit­ted prism glas­ses.

On this page, you will find a com­pre­hen­si­ve over­view of the most com­mon sym­ptoms in adults as well as in child­ren and ado­le­s­cents, the under­ly­ing cau­ses, and the available tre­at­ment opti­ons.

What Is Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion (Hete­ro­pho­ria)?

A bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion (BVD) is a visu­al con­di­ti­on that occurs only during bino­cu­lar (two-eyed) visi­on. It is cau­sed by a subt­le imba­lan­ce in the eye move­ment mus­cles. In medi­cal terms, it is con­side­red a form of latent stra­bis­mus, becau­se the two eyes are not per­fect­ly ali­gned on the same point.

As a result, the images on the two reti­nas do not over­lap pre­cis­e­ly but are slight­ly dis­pla­ced. To fuse the­se mis­a­li­gned images into a sin­gle pic­tu­re, the eye move­ment mus­cles must con­stant­ly com­pen­sa­te. This con­ti­nuous com­pen­sa­to­ry effort can place signi­fi­cant strain on the visu­al sys­tem and trig­ger a wide ran­ge of sym­ptoms — even when the eyes them­sel­ves are healt­hy and distance visi­on is sharp. A bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment is the­r­e­fo­re not a dise­a­se, but a dys­func­tion in the way both eyes work tog­e­ther.

When the mis­a­lignment is accu­ra­te­ly iden­ti­fied and cor­rec­ted with pro­per­ly fit­ted prism glas­ses, the reti­nal images are repo­si­tio­ned pre­cis­e­ly onto the cen­ters of both reti­nas. This allows the visu­al sys­tem to relax — and in many cases, the asso­cia­ted sym­ptoms can be com­ple­te­ly resol­ved.

Typi­cal Sym­ptoms of Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion

A bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion (BVD) can cau­se a wide ran­ge of sym­ptoms, and the­se issues can affect peo­p­le of all ages. Many pati­ents strugg­le for years to under­stand their sym­ptoms becau­se they are often not imme­dia­te­ly reco­gni­zed as visi­on-rela­ted.

Typi­cal signs of bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment /​ hete­ro­pho­ria include:

  • Visu­al strain and rapid eye fati­gue: Tasks such as com­pu­ter work or rea­ding feel exhaus­ting. Text appears unsta­ble, let­ters blur or seem to “move.”
  • Per­sis­tent eye strain, bur­ning, or pain: When the mis­a­lignment can no lon­ger be com­pen­sa­ted, the eye mus­cles remain con­stant­ly ten­se. This often cau­ses pres­su­re behind the eyes — whe­re the eye move­ment mus­cles are loca­ted — which can lead to neck ten­si­on, ten­si­on hea­da­ches, migrai­nes, and even clus­ter hea­da­ches.
  • Fix­a­ti­on and focus pro­blems: Dif­fi­cul­ties occur when shif­ting focus bet­ween near and far, or from right to left and vice ver­sa. Many peo­p­le also strugg­le with fast-chan­ging images in TV/​cinema or with 3D movies. If the mis­a­lignment beco­mes too strong to com­pen­sa­te, inter­mit­tent or con­stant dou­ble visi­on may occur — some­ti­mes only when loo­king left or right.
  • One eye par­ti­ci­pa­ting less in the visu­al pro­cess: This can redu­ce visu­al acui­ty in that eye, impair depth per­cep­ti­on, and cau­se diz­ziness or balan­ce pro­blems, espe­ci­al­ly during eye move­ments. In some indi­vi­du­als, this can trig­ger panic attacks or visu­al migrai­nes.
  • Dis­com­fort in lar­ge indoor spaces: Places such as shop­ping malls or crow­ded envi­ron­ments can cau­se dis­com­fort or anxie­ty. Many pati­ents also have dif­fi­cul­ty wal­king down stairs or escala­tors, or suf­fer from fear of heights. Com­mon sen­sa­ti­ons include men­tal fog (“cot­ton wool in the head”), fee­ling detached, or per­cei­ving the world as if through a film.
  • Nau­sea and moti­on sick­ness: BVD is often the under­ly­ing cau­se of nau­sea, espe­ci­al­ly in cars or buses, as well as sto­mach dis­com­fort. A rela­tively high num­ber of affec­ted indi­vi­du­als are left-han­ded. In some cases, bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment can even con­tri­bu­te to speech dif­fi­cul­ties or stut­te­ring.
  • Eye blin­king, twit­ching, rub­bing, or squin­ting one eye: Many peo­p­le uncon­scious­ly tilt their head (often toward the right should­er) becau­se it makes see­ing more com­for­ta­ble and helps com­pen­sa­te for the mis­a­lignment.
  • Light sen­si­ti­vi­ty: Sen­si­ti­vi­ty to light — even on clou­dy days, under neon light­ing, or when dri­ving at night — is com­mon.
  • Some also expe­ri­ence redu­ced visu­al cla­ri­ty at dusk.
  • Sym­ptoms fluc­tua­ting with dai­ly con­di­ti­on: Visi­on and com­fort vary depen­ding on dai­ly stress levels — stress typi­cal­ly makes the sym­ptoms worse.
  • Other com­mon sym­ptoms: Fati­gue, exhaus­ti­on, lack of moti­va­ti­on, irri­ta­bi­li­ty, tee­th grin­ding, sound sen­si­ti­vi­ty, and some­ti­mes depres­si­on.
  • Chro­nic ten­si­on in the eye mus­cles — and con­se­quent­ly in the jaw and neck — can also trig­ger or wor­sen tin­ni­tus. Seve­ral pati­ents have told me that all their wis­dom tee­th were remo­ved becau­se of the­se sym­ptoms — wit­hout any impro­ve­ment.

All of the visu­al pro­blems abo­ve can also occur when the right and left len­ses of your glas­ses have dif­fe­rent strengths — a con­di­ti­on known as aniso­me­tro­pia.
Even in the­se cases, prism glas­ses often signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce or even com­ple­te­ly resol­ve the sym­ptoms.

Note: Every sym­ptom lis­ted on this page has only been included after many unre­la­ted pati­ents inde­pendent­ly con­firm­ed that their sym­ptoms dis­ap­peared or impro­ved signi­fi­cant­ly once their bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion was cor­rec­ted.

Sym­ptoms of Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion in Child­ren and Ado­le­s­cents

In child­ren and ado­le­s­cents (and in some cases even in adults), a bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion often beco­mes noti­ceable through lear­ning dif­fi­cul­ties or beha­vi­oral pat­terns. Child­ren may…

  • dis­li­ke rea­ding becau­se their eyes tire quick­ly
  • mix up let­ters or swap words
  • con­fu­se num­bers or mis­read mathe­ma­ti­cal sym­bols
  • lose their place while rea­ding and skip lines
  • make many care­less mista­kes
  • strugg­le to under­stand who­le sen­ten­ces
  • need to read the same text mul­ti­ple times to grasp it
  • wri­te and read very slow­ly
  • need fre­quent breaks while rea­ding or wri­ting
  • wri­te with exces­si­ve ten­si­on and pres­su­re
  • have uneven or incon­sis­tent hand­wri­ting
  • be unable to wri­te small let­ters
  • have dif­fi­cul­ty con­cen­t­ra­ting
  • show motor rest­less­ness (fid­ge­ting)
  • appear hyperac­ti­ve
  • seem clum­sy
  • show fear of phy­si­cal move­ment
  • have poor balan­ce, stumb­le easi­ly, or fall fre­quent­ly
  • gene­ral­ly appear inse­cu­re

In some child­ren, bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion is mista­ken­ly inter­pre­ted as dys­le­xia or simp­le “inat­ten­ti­on” — even though the actu­al cau­se lies in bino­cu­lar visi­on.
Once the mis­a­lignment is cor­rec­ted, rea­ding, wri­ting, con­cen­tra­ti­on, and beha­vi­or often impro­ve signi­fi­cant­ly.

Self-Test: Do I Have a Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion?

If you (or your child) expe­ri­ence seve­ral of the sym­ptoms lis­ted abo­ve, you should first visit an oph­thal­mo­lo­gist to rule out any medi­cal eye dise­a­ses.
If no dise­a­se is found and your sym­ptoms per­sist, you can per­form a simp­le self-test to check whe­ther a bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion may be the cau­se.

To per­form the self-test, cover one of your eyes for a few hours using an eye patch or an adhe­si­ve eye pad. If you wear glas­ses, you can also cover one eye by atta­ching a small pie­ce of paper to one of the len­ses. If you see equal­ly well with both eyes, you may cover eit­her eye; other­wi­se, choo­se the eye with wea­k­er visi­on. Make sure to per­form this test only in a safe, fami­li­ar envi­ron­ment — never while dri­ving or doing acti­vi­ties that requi­re depth per­cep­ti­on.

Then obser­ve whe­ther your sym­ptoms impro­ve signi­fi­cant­ly or dis­ap­pear com­ple­te­ly during this time. If they do, this stron­gly indi­ca­tes a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment, sin­ce mono­cu­lar visi­on eli­mi­na­tes the mis­a­lignment that cau­ses the sym­ptoms.

If you alre­a­dy wear prism glas­ses from ano­ther opti­ci­an but still expe­ri­ence sym­ptoms, this self-test can also be valuable: If your sym­ptoms impro­ve when one eye is cover­ed, your mis­a­lignment was very likely not mea­su­red accu­ra­te­ly, and the prism cor­rec­tion needs to be reas­ses­sed.

Pati­ents with clus­ter hea­da­ches can find a sepa­ra­te gui­de to the self-test here: Eye Patch Test for Clus­ter Hea­da­ches.

Tre­at­ment: How Prism Glas­ses Cor­rect a Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Mis­a­lignment

If the eye patch test sug­gests that you may have a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment, the next step is a pre­cise mea­su­re­ment in my prac­ti­ce.

A writ­ten regis­tra­ti­on is requi­red — you can find all infor­ma­ti­on here: Cont­act & Appoint­ment.

I have been working for many years with my own mea­su­re­ment and cor­rec­tion metho­do­lo­gy, which is fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fe­rent from the con­tro­ver­si­al MKH/​Haase method. This approach is the result of deca­des of spe­cia­liza­ti­on exclu­si­ve­ly in bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignments. Becau­se I can exclude all known risks of the MKH method, I offer every pati­ent a gua­ran­tee of cor­rec­tion suc­cess.

The cor­rec­tion of a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment takes place in two steps:

  1. Mono­cu­lar cor­rec­tion (visu­al acui­ty cor­rec­tion): First, the visu­al acui­ty of each eye is deter­mi­ned and cor­rec­ted sepa­ra­te­ly. This ensu­res that the image for­med in the eye lies exact­ly on the cen­ter of the reti­na — not in front of it (myo­pia) and not behind it (hyper­opia).
  2. Bino­cu­lar cor­rec­tion (prism cor­rec­tion): After that, the inter­ac­tion of both eyes during bino­cu­lar visi­on is exami­ned. For opti­mal bino­cu­lar func­tion, the images in the right and left eye must fall pre­cis­e­ly on the cen­ters of both reti­nas, wit­hout hori­zon­tal or ver­ti­cal dis­pla­ce­ment. If dis­pla­ce­ments are pre­sent that the eye move­ment mus­cles can no lon­ger com­pen­sa­te for, this is clas­si­fied as a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment. Such a mis­a­lignment can be cor­rec­ted — after the visu­al acui­ty cor­rec­tion — with prism len­ses.

Key Prin­ci­ple: Mini­mal, pre­cise cor­rec­tion: It is cru­cial to cor­rect only the por­ti­on of the mis­a­lignment that the visu­al sys­tem can no lon­ger com­pen­sa­te for.
This pre­ser­ves the natu­ral com­pen­sa­to­ry abili­ty of the eye mus­cles, kee­ping prism values low and sta­ble.

Important Note: If the prism cor­rec­tion is omit­ted when new len­ses are made in the future, your visi­on will revert to what it was befo­re the cor­rec­tion — inclu­ding all pre­vious sym­ptoms and visu­al strain.

Pati­ent Expe­ri­en­ces: When Sym­ptoms Dis­ap­pear After Prism Glas­ses

Over the past deca­des, more than 4,000 peo­p­le with the sym­ptoms lis­ted abo­ve have come to my prac­ti­ce — often after a long jour­ney through various spe­cia­lists wit­hout fin­ding a clear cau­se. In a very lar­ge num­ber of the­se cases, a pro­per­ly mea­su­red pair of prism glas­ses was able to resol­ve the sym­ptoms per­ma­nent­ly.

On the fol­lo­wing pages, you will find con­cre­te examp­les and per­so­nal feed­back from pati­ents — adults, par­ents, and child­ren — describ­ing how their dai­ly lives chan­ged once their hete­ro­pho­ria was cor­rec­ted:

Fre­quent­ly Asked Ques­ti­ons About Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion (FAQ)

Many pati­ents have simi­lar ques­ti­ons once bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion is suspec­ted, or after they have had their first expe­ri­en­ces with prism glas­ses.
Below you will find the most important ques­ti­ons I am regu­lar­ly asked — tog­e­ther with clear, prac­ti­cal ans­wers based on my dai­ly work with bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignments (hete­ro­pho­ria /​ BVD):

How Com­mon is Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Mis­a­lignment?

Around 70–80 % of all peo­p­le have a hete­ro­pho­ria. In most cases, the eye mus­cles can com­pen­sa­te for this devia­ti­on well, so no sym­ptoms occur. Howe­ver, in about 15 % of affec­ted indi­vi­du­als, the mis­a­lignment leads to signi­fi­cant visu­al strain and dis­com­fort that can have a sub­stan­ti­al impact on qua­li­ty of life. In such cases, a prism cor­rec­tion should be per­for­med.

Why is Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion so Often Over­loo­ked?

Despi­te its fre­quen­cy, bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion (BVD) often remains unde­tec­ted. The main reason is that mea­su­ring BVD is signi­fi­cant­ly more com­plex than deter­mi­ning stan­dard visu­al acui­ty. While visu­al acui­ty is mea­su­red mono­cu­lar­ly and with rela­tively low error, a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment requi­res test­ing both eyes tog­e­ther. This pro­cess demands sub­stan­ti­al expe­ri­ence — and wit­hout it, inac­cu­ra­te mea­su­re­ments are com­mon. In such cases, prism glas­ses may be inef­fec­ti­ve or even into­le­ra­ble. For this reason, many pro­fes­sio­nals avo­id bino­cu­lar mea­su­re­ments altog­e­ther and limit their exami­na­ti­ons to simp­le visu­al acui­ty cor­rec­tion.

Ano­ther con­tri­bu­ting fac­tor is that many pati­ents worry about giving “wrong ans­wers” during the eye exam. In rea­li­ty, inac­cu­ra­te results are almost never the fault of the pati­ent — they are usual­ly cau­sed by unclear or con­fu­sing ques­ti­ons from the exami­ner. When ques­ti­ons are clear, pati­ents pro­vi­de clear ans­wers — a cru­cial pre­re­qui­si­te for pre­cise and relia­ble prism cor­rec­tions.

A fur­ther cau­se of fre­quent mis­in­ter­pre­ta­ti­on is that the term “bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment” (or hete­ro­pho­ria) is lar­ge­ly unknown out­side spe­cia­li­zed fields.
Most pati­ents first con­sult an oph­thal­mo­lo­gist. The­re, dise­a­ses are ruled out and — if visu­al acui­ty is nor­mal — they are often told: “Your eyes are healt­hy, we can­not find a cau­se.”

Becau­se bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion is not clas­si­fied as a dise­a­se and is often not mea­su­red cor­rect­ly during rou­ti­ne exami­na­ti­ons, a signi­fi­cant care gap ari­ses. Many peo­p­le suf­fer sym­ptoms for years wit­hout ever lear­ning the true cau­se. Later — after final­ly expe­ri­en­cing reli­ef with prism glas­ses — many pati­ents ask why oph­thal­mo­lo­gists or orthop­tists were unable to help. The reason lies in the dif­fe­rent pro­fes­sio­nal roles: Oph­thal­mo­lo­gists dia­gno­se and tre­at dise­a­ses, while opto­me­trists mea­su­re and cor­rect refrac­ti­ve and func­tion­al visu­al errors.
This is exact­ly why clo­se col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween the two fields is essen­ti­al: to rule out medi­cal con­di­ti­ons and to cor­rect­ly tre­at func­tion­al mis­a­lignments of the visu­al sys­tem.

How Long Does It Take to Adapt to Prism Glas­ses?

The adapt­a­ti­on peri­od usual­ly cor­re­sponds to the amount of time your eyes nee­ded during the initi­al mea­su­re­ment to ful­ly relax.
Once the visu­al sys­tem has adjus­ted to the new prism cor­rec­tion, you can expect to see cle­ar­ly and wit­hout strain for many years with the­se glas­ses.

Do Prism Glas­ses Have Thi­c­ker Len­ses?

No. With my prism cor­rec­tions, the len­ses are usual­ly just as thin as stan­dard len­ses that cor­rect only visu­al acui­ty. In most cases, other peo­p­le can­not see from the out­side whe­ther your len­ses con­tain a prism cor­rec­tion or not.

How Much Do Prism Len­ses for Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion Cost?

Prism len­ses are more expen­si­ve than stan­dard sin­gle-visi­on len­ses becau­se their manu­fac­tu­ring pro­cess is signi­fi­cant­ly more com­plex. Two sin­gle-visi­on pla­s­tic prism len­ses with hard coa­ting and pre­mi­um anti-reflec­ti­ve coa­ting typi­cal­ly cost around €300. For the actu­al cor­rec­tion of the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment (hete­ro­pho­ria), the­re is an addi­tio­nal fee of around €150 — depen­ding on the time requi­red, the cost may be slight­ly hig­her. We gene­ral­ly do not offer “cheap len­ses” for child­ren. Child­ren — just like adults — see far bet­ter with high-qua­li­ty lens mate­ri­als and coa­tings.

Can Prism Foils Be Used to Cor­rect a Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Mis­a­lignment?

Prism foils should only be used in true emer­gen­cy situa­tions — for exam­p­le, when the requi­red prism len­ses are not yet available.
The reason: prism foils redu­ce visu­al acui­ty and ther­eby wea­k­en fusi­on, the brain’s abili­ty to mer­ge both reti­nal images into one.
A wea­k­en­ed fusi­on increa­ses the likeli­hood that sym­ptoms will reap­pear. For long-term use, a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment should always be cor­rec­ted with prism len­ses, as they pro­vi­de signi­fi­cant­ly bet­ter visu­al acui­ty and the­r­e­fo­re sta­ble fusi­on.

What Hap­pens When Pati­ents Seek Help From an Oph­thal­mo­lo­gist?

Most peo­p­le who come to me with the­se sym­ptoms have pre­vious­ly visi­ted one or seve­ral oph­thal­mo­lo­gists — assum­ing the cau­se must lie within the eyes.
Howe­ver, near­ly all of them were told that their eyes were healt­hy and that no ocu­lar dise­a­se could explain the sym­ptoms. Becau­se no cau­se was iden­ti­fied, many were then refer­red to neu­ro­lo­gists, and — if no fin­dings appeared the­re eit­her — fur­ther to ortho­pe­dists or other spe­cial­ties. This mark­ed the begin­ning of a long jour­ney through various medi­cal depart­ments, during which, just as befo­re, no dise­a­se could be iden­ti­fied as the cau­se. Some of the­se pati­ents even under­went MRI scans or lum­bar punc­tures — like­wi­se wit­hout results. Sin­ce the sym­ptoms per­sis­ted despi­te nor­mal fin­dings, many ulti­m­ate­ly recei­ved the dia­gno­sis of psy­cho­so­ma­tic com­plaints. Howe­ver, this assess­ment pro­ved to be wrong in near­ly all cases. For the vast majo­ri­ty of the­se indi­vi­du­als, sym­ptoms were per­ma­nent­ly resol­ved once a cor­rect­ly mea­su­red pair of prism glas­ses was pro­vi­ded. The true cau­se was a pre­vious­ly unde­tec­ted hete­ro­pho­ria. In total, more than 4,000 peo­p­le with exact­ly this medi­cal histo­ry have been suc­cessful­ly trea­ted in my prac­ti­ce. Many later retur­ned to their oph­thal­mo­lo­gists to report that they had beco­me sym­ptom-free thanks to the prism cor­rec­tion. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, only a few oph­thal­mo­lo­gists show­ed genui­ne inte­rest, and some even ques­tio­ned the impro­ve­ment. Pati­ents found this dis­ap­poin­ting, as it pre­vents mil­li­ons of others from recei­ving the same help.

The­se expe­ri­en­ces cle­ar­ly demons­tra­te a signi­fi­cant gap in care within the health­ca­re sys­tem — par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the reco­gni­ti­on and pro­per eva­lua­ti­on of func­tion­al visu­al dis­or­ders such as hete­ro­pho­ria.

What Are the Con­se­quen­ces When a Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Mis­a­lignment Is Not Detec­ted by an Oph­thal­mo­lo­gist?

If a hete­ro­pho­ria remains unde­tec­ted despi­te nor­mal fin­dings from oph­thal­mo­lo­gists and other spe­cia­lists, the patient’s sym­ptoms often per­sist — some­ti­mes for many years. Based on the reports of affec­ted indi­vi­du­als, seve­ral recur­ring con­se­quen­ces beco­me appa­rent:

  • Per­sis­tent or wor­sening sym­ptoms: Hea­da­ches, migrai­nes, diz­ziness, light sen­si­ti­vi­ty, neck ten­si­on, and con­cen­tra­ti­on dif­fi­cul­ties remain unch­an­ged or inten­si­fy over time.
  • Redu­ced aca­de­mic per­for­mance: Many child­ren and stu­dents strugg­le to absorb lear­ning con­tent or have dif­fi­cul­ty achie­ving their edu­ca­tio­nal goals.
  • Pro­blems in pro­fes­sio­nal life: Exten­ded screen work beco­mes near­ly impos­si­ble for many pati­ents, lea­ding to anxie­ty about job secu­ri­ty — some even lost their jobs or had to stop working tem­po­r­a­ri­ly.
  • Risk of losing ear­ning capa­ci­ty: Some indi­vi­du­als were declared unable to work — and only after cor­rect prism cor­rec­tion were they able to return to their pro­fes­si­ons.
  • Psy­cho­lo­gi­cal stress: When no phy­si­cal cau­se could be iden­ti­fied, many were told their sym­ptoms were psy­cho­so­ma­tic or recei­ved incor­rect psy­cho­lo­gi­cal diagnoses.This often led to emo­tio­nal strain, hope­l­ess­ness, and in some cases depres­si­ve epi­so­des — even sui­ci­dal thoughts (par­ti­cu­lar­ly among peo­p­le with clus­ter hea­da­ches).
  • High medi­ca­ti­on use: Many regu­lar­ly reli­ed on pain­kil­lers or were pre­scri­bed stron­ger medi­ca­ti­ons such as trip­tans or amit­ri­pty­line — usual­ly wit­hout las­ting impro­ve­ment and often accom­pa­nied by signi­fi­cant side effects.
  • Pos­tu­ral pro­blems due to com­pen­sa­ti­on: To com­pen­sa­te for the ver­ti­cal devia­ti­on, some indi­vi­du­als kept their head til­ted — usual­ly toward the right should­er — lea­ding to long-term mus­cu­lar imba­lan­ce.

What If a Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Mis­a­lignment Was Iden­ti­fied but Not Suc­cessful­ly Cor­rec­ted?

Some pati­ents recei­ve a con­firm­ed dia­gno­sis of bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion (hete­ro­pho­ria) but never obtain a cor­rec­tion that tru­ly resol­ves their sym­ptoms.
Many of the­se indi­vi­du­als begin to bla­me them­sel­ves, assum­ing they must be the pro­blem if seve­ral spe­cia­lists were unable to help them achie­ve sym­ptom-free visi­on. The per­sis­tence of sym­ptoms — com­bi­ned with self-doubt — often leads to signi­fi­cant emo­tio­nal and psy­cho­lo­gi­cal strain. If you have had expe­ri­en­ces like the­se, you are not an excep­ti­on. Do not doubt yours­elf: it is not your fault that pre­vious glas­ses did not help. In near­ly all such cases, the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment was mea­su­red incor­rect­ly or impre­cis­e­ly. With a pro­per­ly fit­ted pair of prism glas­ses, you can achie­ve com­for­ta­ble, sym­ptom-free visi­on.

How Can You Tell Whe­ther Prism Glas­ses Have Been Mea­su­red Cor­rect­ly?

You can very easi­ly deter­mi­ne whe­ther your (or your child’s) prism glas­ses have been mea­su­red cor­rect­ly.
A pro­per­ly fit­ted pair of prism glas­ses meets five simp­le cri­te­ria:

  1. You see more cle­ar­ly than befo­re.
  2. Your depth per­cep­ti­on impro­ves.
  3. Your visu­al sym­ptoms and strain-rela­ted com­plaints dis­ap­pear or are signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ced.
  4. The­se impro­ve­ments remain sta­ble over time.
  5. You do not deve­lop any new sym­ptoms.

If you can ans­wer “yes” to all five points over an exten­ded peri­od of time, your prism len­ses were mea­su­red cor­rect­ly. In this case, your visu­al sys­tem will noti­ce­ab­ly relax, and you will enjoy wea­ring the glas­ses. I offer a gua­ran­tee on my prism cor­rec­tions — even if you pre­vious­ly had other prism glas­ses that did not help you.

What Risks Are Asso­cia­ted With Cor­rec­ting a Hete­ro­pho­ria?

In Ger­ma­ny, bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignments are almost always mea­su­red using the MKH method deve­lo­ped by H.-J. Haa­se. This method is con­tro­ver­si­al becau­se it car­ri­es seve­ral risks:

  • the prism glas­ses may be inef­fec­ti­ve,
  • they may wor­sen sym­ptoms,
  • they may help only tem­po­r­a­ri­ly, or
  • the prism values may increase at every fol­low-up mea­su­re­ment with the Pola­test.

In some cases, pati­ents are even advi­sed to under­go an unneces­sa­ry eye mus­cle sur­gery as a result. Over the past years, thou­sands of peo­p­le with MKH prism glas­ses have come to me — and in many of the­se cases, the­se risks were inde­ed pre­sent.
I do not work with the MKH method. Ins­tead, I use a dif­fe­rent, more pre­cise pro­ce­du­re that cor­rects only the por­ti­on of the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment that actual­ly cau­ses sym­ptoms. This approach relia­bly eli­mi­na­tes all of the risks men­tio­ned abo­ve.

What Does a “Prism Build-Up” Under the MKH Method Mean — and Why Is It Pro­ble­ma­tic?

When MKH prism glas­ses do not ful­ly resol­ve sym­ptoms, the prism values are often increased repea­ted­ly in short inter­vals. The goal is to reach the maxi­mum mea­sura­ble mis­a­lignment of the eye mus­cles. Once the mis­a­lignment beco­mes so lar­ge that it can no lon­ger be cor­rec­ted with prism len­ses (becau­se they would beco­me too thick and hea­vy), pati­ents are fre­quent­ly advi­sed to under­go eye mus­cle sur­gery.

I con­sider this approach fun­da­men­tal­ly incor­rect. Sym­ptoms are never cau­sed by the enti­re mus­cu­lar imba­lan­ce, but by a small, usual­ly ver­ti­cal com­po­nent of the mis­a­lignment. This com­po­nent must be cor­rec­ted pre­cis­e­ly — not less, but cer­tain­ly not more. A full prism cor­rec­tion of the enti­re mus­cu­lar imba­lan­ce pro­vi­des no bene­fit for the pati­ent and ins­tead crea­tes unneces­sa­ry dis­ad­van­ta­ges.

Hundreds of peo­p­le have come to me after their MKH prism values were repea­ted­ly increased. All of them repor­ted that they saw worse and with more strain as the prism strength increased. Many right­ly ques­tio­ned the con­tin­ued escala­ti­on of their prism values. In the vast majo­ri­ty of cases, I am able to redu­ce the­se exces­si­ve values back to the neces­sa­ry mini­mum. When only the por­ti­on that actual­ly cau­ses sym­ptoms is cor­rec­ted, pati­ents expe­ri­ence sta­ble, long-term reli­ef — and a sup­po­sedly “neces­sa­ry” eye mus­cle sur­gery beco­mes unneces­sa­ry.

When Can Prism Values Be Redu­ced?

In gene­ral, the rule is: A wrong pair of glas­ses can wor­sen your visi­on — this appli­es both to stan­dard visu­al acui­ty cor­rec­tions and to the cor­rec­tion of a bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion.

A pair of glas­ses is con­side­red “wrong” if:

  • the visu­al acui­ty cor­rec­tion is inac­cu­ra­te, mea­ning the image is no lon­ger focu­sed pre­cis­e­ly on the cen­ter of the reti­na → visi­on beco­mes blur­red.
  • the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment is not cor­rec­ted or cor­rec­ted incor­rect­ly, mea­ning the two reti­nal images are hori­zon­tal­ly or ver­ti­cal­ly dis­pla­ced → the brain does not recei­ve sharp, matching visu­al impres­si­ons.

If such incor­rect glas­ses are worn for a long peri­od of time, visu­al acui­ty may slow­ly dete­rio­ra­te. Howe­ver, if both visu­al acui­ty and the bino­cu­lar mis­a­lignment are cor­rec­ted accu­ra­te­ly, this dete­rio­ra­ti­on can usual­ly be ful­ly rever­sed.

With a cor­rect­ly fit­ted pair of prism glas­ses, the brain once again recei­ves sharp images from both eyes. This allows the brain to “learn to see” again — visu­al acui­ty impro­ves, finer details beco­me easier to reco­gni­ze, and fusi­on (the brain’s abili­ty to com­bi­ne both images into one) beco­mes stron­ger. Bet­ter fusi­on enhan­ces depth per­cep­ti­on and sta­bi­li­zes the enti­re visu­al pro­cess.

For peo­p­le with a bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment, this impro­ved fusi­on has an addi­tio­nal bene­fit: the eye move­ment mus­cles beco­me bet­ter able to com­pen­sa­te for the remai­ning mus­cu­lar imba­lan­ce. As a result, the mis­a­lignment decrea­ses over time, and the prism values can be redu­ced. Visi­on with wea­k­er prisms beco­mes not only more com­for­ta­ble but also more sta­ble and rela­xed.

How Can Prism Values Be Kept Low and Sta­ble?

Prism values remain per­ma­nent­ly low and sta­ble when only the por­ti­on of the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment that the eyes can no lon­ger com­pen­sa­te for is cor­rec­ted. This is the decisi­ve dif­fe­rence.

Every per­son can com­for­ta­b­ly move their eyes hori­zon­tal­ly and adjust them to dif­fe­rent distances. When focu­sing on near objects, the eyes turn slight­ly inward; when loo­king into the distance, they return to a par­al­lel posi­ti­on. For this reason, most peo­p­le can com­pen­sa­te for hori­zon­tal bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignments wit­hout sym­ptoms. A hori­zon­tal prism cor­rec­tion is the­r­e­fo­re often unnecessary—or signi­fi­cant­ly wea­k­er than the mea­su­re­ment results on the Pola­test might sug­gest.

Ver­ti­cal mis­a­lignments, howe­ver, can­not be com­pen­sa­ted for con­scious­ly. No one can inten­tio­nal­ly move one eye slight­ly upward and the other slight­ly down­ward. Even very small ver­ti­cal devia­ti­ons can cau­se pro­no­un­ced visu­al dis­com­fort and must be cor­rec­ted with prisms. This ver­ti­cal “ali­gnment” of the eyes can­not be lear­ned or trai­ned — not through visi­on the­ra­py, not through orthop­tic exer­ci­s­es, and not in any visi­on trai­ning pro­gram.

Becau­se ver­ti­cal devia­ti­ons are gene­ral­ly very small, they can usual­ly be cor­rec­ted with very low prism values — often in the ran­ge of 0.25 to 0.75 prism diop­ters. The­se mini­mal devia­ti­ons are often not detec­ted by oph­thal­mo­lo­gists or opti­ci­ans using stan­dard prism bars, becau­se tho­se typi­cal­ly start mea­su­ring at 1.00 prism diop­ter. As a result, many pati­ents are mista­ken­ly told that their sym­ptoms are “not coming from the eyes,” even though that is pre­cis­e­ly the case.

When only the por­ti­on of the mis­a­lignment that the per­son can no lon­ger com­pen­sa­te for is cor­rec­ted, the natu­ral com­pen­sa­to­ry abili­ties of the eye mus­cles remain ful­ly int­act — and the prism values stay per­ma­nent­ly low and sta­ble. I have not had a sin­gle case in which prism values increased or an eye mus­cle sur­gery beca­me neces­sa­ry. This is espe­ci­al­ly important for indi­vi­du­als who worry that prism glas­ses ine­vi­ta­b­ly lead to con­ti­nuous­ly rising or very high prism strengths — which is sim­ply not true when the cor­rec­tion is done cor­rect­ly.

Is The­re Real­ly a Dis­pu­te About Prism Glas­ses — and Who Is Right?

It is often said that the­re is a fun­da­men­tal dis­pu­te bet­ween oph­thal­mo­lo­gists and opto­me­trists regar­ding prism glas­ses and the signi­fi­can­ce of bino­cu­lar visi­on dys­func­tion. From my per­spec­ti­ve, this dis­pu­te does not tru­ly exist. I do not cla­im to “be right,” nor do I deny anyo­ne else the pos­si­bi­li­ty of being right. I always lea­ve that judgment to the peo­p­le who mat­ter most: the pati­ents them­sel­ves.

Ulti­m­ate­ly, only one thing counts: If someone can see com­for­ta­b­ly and wit­hout sym­ptoms over the long term with their prism glas­ses, then tho­se glas­ses are cor­rect. If not, they are not.

If ever­yo­ne invol­ved con­sis­t­ent­ly lis­ten­ed to what pati­ents actual­ly expe­ri­ence — how they see with their glas­ses and how their sym­ptoms chan­ge — many misun­derstan­dings and this sup­po­sed dis­pu­te would quick­ly dis­ap­pear.

What Should I Know About Dou­ble Visi­on (Diplo­pia)?

Dou­ble visi­on can have many dif­fe­rent cau­ses. For this reason, it is essen­ti­al to under­go com­pre­hen­si­ve medi­cal exami­na­ti­ons first so that poten­ti­al dise­a­ses can be ruled out or trea­ted. Howe­ver, if neither an oph­thal­mo­lo­gist nor any other spe­cia­list finds a medi­cal cau­se, the under­ly­ing reason for the dou­ble visi­on is often a pro­no­un­ced imba­lan­ce in the eye move­ment mus­cles. In such cases, the visu­al sys­tem is no lon­ger able to mer­ge the images from both eyes into a sin­gle, uni­fied pic­tu­re. This imba­lan­ce usual­ly exis­ted long befo­re the dou­ble visi­on appeared and had been com­pen­sa­ted for over many years. Visi­ble diplo­pia often appears only when the body beco­mes phy­si­cal­ly wea­k­en­ed, during ill­ness, or when visu­al acui­ty is not cor­rec­ted accu­ra­te­ly.

In cor­rec­ting dou­ble visi­on, I address only the por­ti­on of the bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment that the pati­ent can no lon­ger com­pen­sa­te. This keeps the prism len­ses as weak as pos­si­ble — a stra­tegy that has pro­ven high­ly suc­cessful in prac­ti­ce. Many peo­p­le who come to me have suf­fe­r­ed from dou­ble visi­on for months or even years, often accom­pa­nied by addi­tio­nal sym­ptoms. Almost all had under­go­ne exten­si­ve dia­gno­stic test­ing, inclu­ding MRI scans or lum­bar punc­tures, wit­hout any con­clu­si­ve fin­dings. Some were even dia­gno­sed with troch­lear ner­ve pal­sy, alt­hough their dou­ble visi­on could be com­ple­te­ly resol­ved through pre­cise prism cor­rec­tion. In all the­se cases, the true cau­se was a pre­vious­ly unde­tec­ted bino­cu­lar visi­on mis­a­lignment.

For dou­ble visi­on not cau­sed by dise­a­se, I can pro­vi­de a gua­ran­tee for sym­ptom-free visi­on; whe­ther this is a full gua­ran­tee or a par­ti­al one can only be deter­mi­ned after the exami­na­ti­on. If dou­ble visi­on is cau­sed by a medi­cal con­di­ti­on and per­sists despi­te tre­at­ment, ever­y­thing should still be done to cor­rect it with appro­pria­te len­ses — prism glas­ses can often help in the­se cases as well, and I always work clo­se­ly with oph­thal­mo­lo­gists when deal­ing with dise­a­se-rela­ted diplo­pia.

Whe­re Can I Find More Infor­ma­ti­on About Bino­cu­lar Visi­on Dys­func­tion and Ver­ti­cal Hete­ro­pho­ria?

A high­ly recom­men­ded source is the work of Dr. Debby Fein­berg„ an opto­me­trist from the United Sta­tes who also spe­cia­li­zes in the cor­rec­tion of ver­ti­cal hete­ro­pho­ria. Her edu­ca­tio­nal resour­ces pro­vi­de many addi­tio­nal expl­ana­ti­ons, case examp­les, and in-depth infor­ma­ti­on on this topic.

Feel free to recom­mend this web­site to others: